Continuing on the theme of masquerade...

As promised here are some photos of that caterpillar that was peeking out in one of the photos in my last post. This is another Prepona sp. but I'm not sure which. I only found it because of the conspicuous frass pile collecting on a leaf underneath. What drew me to that tree though was the characteristic feeding damage from Prepona caterpillars. They chew off the first half of the leaf but leave the middle vein, then to that vein they silk small cut trimmings of that leaf to give it a "trashy" kind of look. During the smaller instars the caterpillars are usually seen dangling from the end of the vein in full sight, but they look so much like the other "trash" that you often miss them. The bigger ones will sit right on top of leaves or on branches. This one was dangling from a full dead leaf that had been silked to the branch. It was wrapped kind of in a spiral shape on that handing leaf. I showed it to several people and they didn’t see it even when they were inches away.

Prepona sp. (Nymphalidae)



Here is a smaller individual from the same plant (maybe a full sib). The first photo below shows the characteristic feeding damage.



It almost disappears once it gets amongst its "trash" on the leaf vein. In many ways masquerade is more similar to mimicry than crypsis. When people discuss crypsis as an anti-predator defence they usually mean that the predator does not detect the prey. It is perhaps more realistic to recognise that the predator does see the object it just doesn't think that that object is a meal. In classical Batesian mimicry theory, the number of mimics should be smaller than the number of models (model = the object being mimicked), otherwise predators don’t learn to avoid that type of prey. Biologists call this "frequency-dependence" because the efficacy of the defence depends on the relative frequency of the models to mimics. In theory this should be the case in masquerade too, it's just that the model is usually something incredibly common like a living/dead leaf or a twig.

On a night walk tonight I found another dead leaf mimic:


A colleague/friend recently blogged about The weird and wonderful world of katydids. I doubt that I could do a better job of enthusiastically describing these guys so I'll leave you to read his post. He writes very well and I highly recommend following his blog: Katatrepsis. He's right though, the detail of the false venation is mind-blowing.

7 comments:

  1. thank you for putting this up such a really great site. Stimulating me to read much more.

    Piper
    www.trendone.net

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have a wonderful blog and it is quite unique and interesting. Keep it up and hope to read more updates from your blog.


    Jim
    www.imarksweb.org

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed reading your article. I found this as an informative and interesting post, so i think it is very useful and knowledgeable. I would like to thank you for the effort you have made in writing this article.


    edupdf.org

    ReplyDelete

  4. Thanks for sharing your article and for giving us the chance to read it. It is very helpful and encouraging. Visit my site too.

    triciajoy.com

    www.triciajoy.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. So happy to be given a privilege to post a comment here. You have a wonderful site. Thank you for the effort to publish this.

    www.gofastek.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Loved the content! You have mentioned every aspect of the subject through this article, can you please write about "accountants for healthcare"?

    ReplyDelete