Friday 14 December 2012

What makes an eyespot? Cuticular proteins of course!

Close-up of an eyespot on a Papilio xuthus caterpillar [NOT the Eye of Sauron].
Photo from Futahashi et al. (2012) BMC Biology 10:46
My PhD research is generally focussed on the ecology and evolution of eyespots in caterpillars. That includes questions relating to how effectively these markings deter attacking birds?, but also marcoevolutionary questions like why did eyespots evolve in the species they did?

How are eyespots formed? however, is a different, yet equally important set of research questions which involes molecular techniques that I have little-to-no experience with. A research group out of Japan has recently identified a set of genes involved in producing markings on a caterpillar's cuticle, some of which are directly involved in the formation of eyespots. Their paper was published a paper in a prestigious open access journal called BMC Biology


Aside: I'm not talking about fingernails here! For insects, the cuticle refers to their exoskeleton - what caterpillar's have in place of "skin". The cuticle is made up of the epicuticle (thin, waxy, water-resistant outer layer containing no chitin), and a layer beneath it called the procuticle (chitinous and thicker). The procuticle itself is composed of the the exocuticle (rigid and hard) and the endocuticle (tough and flexible). In caterpillars the exocuticle is greatly reduced which gives them their soft-bodies.


Because the paper is "open access" it can be downloaded for free here:


Before this project had begun, the researchers had some idea of what parts of the genome code for proteins related to pigment colour in caterpillars, and that a switch in larval colour pattern from "bird-dropping" to "cryptic" within Papilio caterpillars was related to a decline in the amount of circulating juvenile hormone (JH) at the start of the 4th larval instar. Other than that, little was known about the genes related to specific colour patterns in caterpillars, despite a fair amount of similar work having already been done in adult butterflies. The researchers therefore set out to identify the genes associated with specific colour patterns expressed in butterfly caterpillars, patterns like the eyespots of Papilio caterpillars.

A generalized schematic showing the moulting process of a Papilio xuthus caterpillar from the 3rd to 5th instar. This image is from Figure 2 of Futahashi et al 2012.
One key result of this research was that some of the regulatory genes involved in caterpillar colour pattern were specific to the larval stage and differed from those genes associated with adult colour pattern, yet other genes participate in the formation of colour pattern in both larvae and adults. The researchers found at least two transcription factor genes that are associated with the Papilio caterpillar eyespots. Specifically they were able to show that the black part of the eyespot is related to a gene called "spalt", which has also been linked to black markings in butterfly wings. They also found that E75A and/or E75B regulate both the specific marking produced, and when (i.e., during what instar) that marking is produced. E75 is an ecdysteroid signal-related transcription factor and the ecdysteroid synthesis enzyme 3DE 3b-reductase are clearly associated with eyespot markings.
"What the heck is an ecdysteroid?" - said almost everyone. 
Aside: As insects grow they shed their skin. You might know this process as "moulting", but scientists have another term for it - ecdysis. Ecdysteroids are just hormones involved in the moulting process of insects. An "ecdysteroid synthesis enzyme" is biological molecule associated with manufacturing these hormones.

Two pieces of evidence allow the authors can be quite certain that the genes described above are involved in the coordinated genetic regulation of caterpillar colour pattern formation: i) the eyespot markings that these genes are associated with only occur only at certain instars, and 2) previous work has shown that these genes are related to the moulting process.

In addition to spalt and E75, three Papilio-specific genes were found: Px-0559, which was associated with black markings; Px-3233, associated with yellow markings; and Px-3244, associated with eyespot markings. These genes were expressed during the middle or late moulting period which coincides with the switch in colour formation from the "bird-dropping" colour pattern to the "green with eyespots" colour pattern. The relative amount of expression for each of these genes likely varies among species in such a way that it produces species-specific colour patterns.

One more thing - the researchers also looked at the specific areas of a caterpillar's cuticle where some of these genes specifically targeted to see if the structure of the exoskeleton in those areas might also be affected. They did this by looking at these areas with a high powered microscope called an electron microscope. They found that there were distinct structural differences in those areas of the caterpillar's cuticle that possessed distinct markings. In particular the eyespot region was easily recognized by the structure alone when examined using electron microscopy. Specifically, the black region of the eyespot was relatively fine, whereas yellowish green region around the eyespot was relatively course, and the red area was intermediate. Interestingly, the white stripe in the centre of the eyespot had "a very smooth surface", and apparently the authors have previously shown that there is a muscle attached to this white stripe region.
A close up of the eyespot region of a Papilio xuthus caterpillar using scanning electron microscopy. This image is from Figure 8C of Futahashi et al 2012.
Overall this piece of the research shows us that there is a tight association between colour pattern and surface structure. The function or adaptive value of this association is interesting to think about. Does a different texture affect how light reflects from these parts of the caterpillar's body? Could this help increase the salience of the eyespot to onlooking birds? Do these textural differences make the eyespot look more like a real eye? We know that some of the beautiful colours we see in butterflies and birds are actually created by specific surface structures, but might structure play additional, under-appreciated roles in crypsis or mimicry? I welcome any thoughts or comments you may have - you can post them in the comments section below.

*Minor corrections made Dec 17 2012

Friday 23 November 2012

Flickr Group: "Caterpillars with Eyespots"


Some time ago I made a Flickr group called "Caterpillars with Eyespots" to collect photos of caterpillars that have eyespots. This is a great place for people to see the diversity in both the eyespots themselves, and the species that possess them! There are examples from all over the globe. Right now (Nov 23 2012) this group has 170 photos in the pool, and new ones are added all the time so be sure to check in regularly.

About "Caterpillars with Eyespots"

This is a group dedicated to collecting photos of Lepidopteran caterpillars with eyespots, or otherwise mimic snakes. 

Eyespots (markings that resemble vertebrate eyes) have evolved many times in Lepidopterans (butterflies and moths). The fact that this adaptation has arisen independently so often in this group indicates the general effectiveness of this anti-predator defence.


When adding a photo it is not a problem if you are unsure about the ID, but where possible please include any additional information about behaviour or body size and tag the following in any photo you add:


-Family

-Latin name (binomial name)
-Location (i.e., geotag)


If you are interested in the topic of caterpillar eyespots, or have photos you would like to add please consider joining the group and contributing to either the discussion topics or photo archive. You will need a Flickr account, but signing up is quite painless because you can link it directly to your Yahoo, Google, or Facebook account.

Friday 16 November 2012

The Biologija Bump!

What up Finland?

Map showing the geographical distribution of "hits" on this blog Nov 16th 2012.
You can't see Croatia well on this map but I assure you that the Croats are coming out too!

Excitingly, my blog has reached a new audience today according to Google Analytics. Over the last week or so I have been corresponding with journalists from Biologija.com.hr about my research on caterpillar eyespots. Specifically, Behija Salkić and the journalist Nikola Koletić have expressed a keen interest in my work and and have been great to work with. Their article came out today and can be found here. The article is in Croatian, but if English readers are interested in reading it they could always use Google Translator. The translated article title is: "Colouration of the caterpillar - an evolutionary advantage or something else?". More information about this particular research paper can be found here.

Biologija.com.hr is a website run by a non-profit organization called Bioteka-NGO based in Croatia whose main goals are to promote general understanding of the natural sciences in society, make science more engaging and interesting, and raise awareness about the role the public plays in preserving the environment. Occasionally, general interest pieces on biological research in the news are overly simplified, contain inaccuracies, or unjustifiably extapolate the results, so for interest's sake I used Google Translate on some of their content. I must say that I was really impressed with the accuracy of their information and the overall quality of the science writing on Biologija.com.hr. Keep up the good work!

A personal note to any first-time visitors: Welcome to my blog! Have a look around - I have listed the most-visited posts below. I hope you find something in my posts that interests you, and be sure to check back in from time to time to see how my work progresses. 

As always, feel free to leave any questions or comments in the 'comments' section below.

My top 5 most-visited posts:



Tuesday 30 October 2012

I liked lithographed images BEFORE it was cool

Deilephila elpenor (Sphingidae)
This is a vintage lithographed image of a Deilephila elpenor caterpillar from "Europe's Best-Known Butterflies" (F. Nemos, Berlin, 1895). A collection of 100 of these images were recently scanned and archived at www.OldBookArt.com where they have been marked as public domain, and subsequently added to Wikipedia Commons.

I stumbled across these pictures accidentally when looking at photos of Deilephila elpenor caterpillars and saw the following image:

That's right! Are you tired of the lack of insect-related apparel in you wardrobe? Now you can get your very own eyespot caterpillar trucker hat! Zazzle.ca is selling an array of mesh-back "Trucker" hats that feature the charismatic eyespot caterpillar of Deilephila elpenor!

Features:
  • Trucker Hat
  • 100% polyester foam front
  • Wide area to feature your design
  • 100% nylon mesh back keeps you cool
  • Adjustable from 17" to 24"
  • Available in 11 color combination
The hats are retailing for $21.35 ea + shipping and come in 11 different colours. You can customize your hat however you want right on the site! You will have all the hipsters wishing they were as cool as you.

If you like that caterpillar graphic check out this Wikipedia Commons page that has 100 more graphics from F. Nemos! Here are a few beautiful samples:

Death's-head Hawk moth - Acherontia atropos

Death's-head Hawk moth - Acherontia atropos
Tau Emperor - Aglia tau (male)
Deilephila nerii
Old World Swallowtail - Papilio machaon

Monday 22 October 2012

Pink Underwing Moth (Phyllodes imperialis) - Family: Noctuidae

Pink Underwing Moth - Phyllodes imperialis (Noctuidae)

Final instar Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar.
Recently this spectacular photo has been floating around the internet. I saw it first on Jerry Coyne's "website", then later on Imgur, and then on a crytozoology fact-checking blog called CryptoVille. I have seen a lot of caterpillars with eyespots, but I had never seen this one. This is the caterpillar of a large moth species called the Pink Underwing Moth (Phyllodes imperialis).

The best description of the species I could find comes from an Australian Government website. The Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities had a Species Profile and Threats Database entry for Pink Underwing Moth (Phyllodes imperialis), where the species has been listed as Endangered. Like most endangered insects the threat is mainly from habitat loss and fragmentation due to logging, agriculture, and other development. Additional information comes from a very useful website on Australian caterpillars (http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/) which is managed by Don Herbison-Evans, and Stella A. Crossley. Unfortunately Stella passed away in 2007, but I have corresponded with Don - he was both enthusiastic and helpful. Finally, I fact-checked these e-resources using the book Moths of Austraila by I.F.B Common. Below I have summarized the reliable information I found about this species.

Species Description

Larva:

Early instars are dull brown, but green individuals are also observed. I'm not sure whether this colour variation is ontological (i.e., changes as the caterpillar ages) or if there are green and brown phenotypes. Later instars have two pairs of distinct eyespots on the anterior end. One pair is on the lateral sides of the first abdominal body segment, while the other pair is concealed under folds of skin.

The caterpillar apparently relies at least in part on crypsis to avoid detection by predators, possibly masquerading as a dried up leaf.

Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar resting on a Carronia multisepalea vine stem
Photo courtesy of plant.nerd. See original photo on Flickr here.
Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar resting on a Carronia multisepalea leaf
Photo courtesy of plant.nerdSee original photo on Flickr here.

However, when the caterpillar feels threatened it rears its anterior body segments, and bends between the first and second abdominal segments. The caterpillar simultaneously curls its real head as well as its true legs underneath the raised portion of its body. By curing in its head and body this way the caterpillar stretches the skin on its dorsal side and reveals the previously-concealed eyespots. These large eyespots are composed of a black pupil surrounded by a blue, then yellow ring (see photos below). Between and below the eyespots are white markings, often described as looking like teeth, and indeed resemble the teeth from a cartoon skeleton. At least 150 people from the Imgur community apparently think it looks like the face of Deadpool especially with the red body depicted in the photo at the top of this post.

This caterpillar is sometimes referred to as the "Big headed caterpillar", the name obviously referring to the appearance of a large false head when the caterpillar adopts this defensive posture. The display likely protects the caterpillar from vertebrate predators (Common 1990). Eyespots and the associated behavioural mimicry that creates a false-head are not uncommon in butterfly and moth caterpillars. Generally it is thought that this suite of traits protects the relatively helpless caterpillars by making them look like a threat (e.g., a snake or other dangerous predator) to an attacker such as an insect-eating bird (Janzen et al 2010).

Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar in defensive posture
Photo courtesy of plant.nerdSee original photo on Flickr here.
Close up of the Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar's eyespots revealed when the caterpillar is threatened
Photo courtesy of plant.nerd. See original photo on Flickr here
Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar in defensive posture
Photo courtesy of plant.nerd. See original photo on Flickr here.
I asked plant.nerd about the caterpillar and how he stimulated the response:
    "These larvae sit flat against the vine like a dead leaf or branch they are very camouflaged and hard to spot. When you place your moving hand close to them or touch them they rear up and bend to reveal the eye spots and the white markings which are usually hidden in a fold of skin."
    • See the full set of plant.nerd's Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar images here.
    The caterpillars feed exclusively on the vines from the Menispermaceae family. In particular the relatively rare vine Carronia multisepalea is reported to be the main food plant. However, other subspecies reportedly feed on Pycanarrhena species of vine (e.g. Pycnarrhena australiana).

    Carronia multisepalea vine the larval host plant of Phyllodes imperialis.
    Photo courtesy of plant.nerd. See original photo on Flickr here.

    Pupa: 

    Many caterpillars change colour at the end of their final larval instar (e.g., Papilio canadensis). This typically coincides with the the end of foraging and beginning of searching for pupation sites. I think this is probably why the caterpillar at the top of this post is red, although spectacular colour morphs are sometimes observed in the caterpillars of other species as well as in other insects (e.g., Pink Katydids). The pupa is about 5 cm long, and is loosely woven into dead leaves on the ground. It is described as bronze in colour, and marked with transparent circumferential panels on the abdominal segments.

    Adult:

    Wingspan listed as 130–140 mm by the Australian Dept. of S.E.W.P.C., but other reports indicate that the size range extends to 170 mm. This discrepancy might indicate that the other populations outside of Australia (Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, and New Caledonia) have larger individuals.

    The "leaf-shaped" forewings are grey-brown and posses a distinctive white marking which seems to vary somewhat among populations. The ventral side of the forewing has a discal, dark-brown coloured patch containing three white spots. The hindwings are dark brown-black with a central patch of pink extending to the inner margin, to which the common name "Pink Underwing Moth" refers. The hindwings are also fringed with 7-8 white lunules on the outer margin. The thorax and abdomen are the same grey-brown colour. A morphologically distinct subspecies of P. imperialis occurs in northern Queensland. The two Australian subspecies are allopatric and the northern subspecies has a larger pink patch on the hindwings.

    Lithograph of an adult Phyllodes imperialis from the Collection of the British Museum
    CATALOGUE OF THE NOCTUIDAE IN THE COLLECTION OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (1903-1913)
    Sourced from Wikipedia Commons
    Dorsal view of a female Phyllodes imperialis
    Sourced from Wikipedia Commons
    Ventral view of female Phyllodes imperialis
    Sourced from Wikipedia Commons
    Adult Phyllodes imperialis moth from Papua New Guinea. The coin is 3 cm in diameter!
    Photo courtesy of kahunapulej. Original photo can be seen here.
    Adult Phyllodes imperialis held by a little girl named Rachel.
    Photo courtesy of kahunapulejOriginal photo can be seen here.

    Habitat:

    In Australia the moth is only found in undisturbed, subtropical rainforest below the altitude of 600 m. It is tightly associated with the Carronia multisepalea vine. Interestingly, it seems that only when the plant takes the form of a collapsed shrub, and not when it grows in an upright form, does C. multisepalea provide the food and habitat requirements for the moth to breed. As mentioned the moth is also known from Papua New Guinea (incl. the Bismark Archipelago), the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu (New Hebrides), and New Caledonia (Common 1990). The New Caledonia population is apparently considered a distinct subspecies (Common 1990).

    Acknowledgements:

    Both plant.nerd and kahunapulej were very friendly when I contacted them and allowed me to use their spectacular photos for this post. Be sure to check out their photo streams on Flickr:

    References:

    Common, I.F.B. (1990) Moths of Australia. E.J. Brill, New York and Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia. Page 454.

    Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). Phyllodes imperialis (southern subsp. - ANIC 3333) in Species Profile and Threats Database, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/sprat. Accessed Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:04:45 +1100.

    Herbison-Evans, D., Crossley, S. and Moss, J. Lepidoptera Butterflyhouse entry for Phyllodes imperialis.  Updated April 1 2011. http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/cato/imper.html

    Janzen D.H., Hallwachs, W., Burns, J.M. (2010) A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. Proceedings to the National Academy of Sciences 26:11659:11665

    Wikipedia entry for Phyllodes imperialis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllodes_imperialis Accessed: Oct 20 2012.

    Tuesday 18 September 2012

    Clay and pastry caterpillars in science education

    Pastry caterpillars: a tool to teach evolution by natural selection

    Last week Jay Fitzsimmons over at the Canadian Field-Naturalist Blog sent me an article from the new issue of The American Biology Teacher that describes how teachers can use clay caterpillars to teach ecology and evolution to their students. I whole-heartedly embrace the dissemination of techniques that can help teachers educate students about ecology and evolution, so I wanted to highlight this and a few other logistical tips that would help teachers who might consider running a fake caterpillar lab exercise with their class.

    Here is the citation & link to the paper:

    Barber, N. (2012) Clay caterpillars: a tool for ecology & evolution laboratories. The American Biology Teacher 74(7): 513-517.

    Jay sent this paper along because he knows about my work using pastry caterpillars to study the protective value of eyespots on caterpillar-like prey (Hossie and Sherratt 2012). The pastry caterpillar system has been used countless times to study a range of topics, most notably in the study of apostatic selection (Allen and Anderson 1984), polymorphisms (Wennersten and Forsman 2009), and countershading (Rowland et al. 2008). Clearly this experimental approach can be modified to examine a wide variety of questions relating to natural selection.


    How it works:

    • Fake caterpillars are made using pastry dough (flour + lard) dyed with food colouring, or modelling clay. The colour, shape, and size of your caterpillars and the proportion of each type that you deploy depends on the question you want to examine.
    • Caterpillars should be roughly 5-30 mm long and 3-6 mm wide
    • Caterpillars are deployed in the field either on short-cut lawns, painted wooden boards, or pinned to tree branches where they will be susceptible to "predation" by wild birds (e.g., sparrows, chickadees, starlings etc.)
    • After a pre-defined amount of time (e.g., 24 h), return and record which prey were attacked or removed

    Tips:

    • Often it is good practice to train and/or attract birds ahead of time in the site where you will be conducting the experiment using birdseed or small pieces of plain pastry dough.
    • Birds are typically most active in the early morning. Consider deploying very early morning or the evening before.
    • Consider using areas where predation by animals other than birds might not be as big an issue.
    • Some "background" predation is likely to occur (i.e., from ants, squirrels, chipmunks, mice etc.), but this is usually not a big problem. You can choose to count them as killed, survived, or eliminate them from the proportion survived calculation (i.e., 50 deployed, 10 pecked, 2 eaten by ants -> 38/48 = 79% survived).
    • Presenting prey on elevated platforms or pinning them to tree branches can minimize the effects of ants and small mammals.
    • Small mammals will be a bigger issue if you leave prey deployed on the ground overnight.

    Barber presents this experimental approach as a framework through which teachers could examine ecological and evolutionary questions with their students. Ecological questions could relate to the abundance and distribution of animals in various habitats, whereas evolutionary questions might examine how natural selection can shape appearances or behaviours in a population. As Barber sees it, the main advantage of this kind of lab is its flexibility in allowing students to develop and test hypotheses according to their own interests. Barber states:
    The possible hypotheses for students to explore are almost limitless and, with no “wrong” answers, interpreting results can be a valuable critical-thinking exercise.
    Actually this is not a new idea. In 1993 J. A. Allen and his colleagues presented a similar technique for using pastry caterpillars to teach similar concepts in the Journal of Biological Education:

    Allen, J. A., Cooper, J. M., Hall, G. J. and McHenry C. (1993) 'Evolving pastry': a method for simulating microevolution. Journal of Biological Education 27(4): 274-282.

    This paper provides project ideas specifically designed to teach evolution by natural selection. Real evolution takes a very long time to observe, but it can be simulated in the short-term (i.e., over a couple of days) through the successive deployment of various fake caterpillars in the field. The key is to use the proportion of caterpillars surviving after one day of "predation" to set up the proportion of caterpillars from each treatment in the following deployment, then repeat. For example, imagine a study where you were interested in the evolution of camouflage colour in prey. You might deploy 100 prey on tree branches, 50 brown ones and 50 green ones. After 24 h you check the attack rate, and you see 20 brown ones killed and but only 5 green ones killed. That means that 30 brown (30/50 = 60% of brown prey), and 45 green (45/50 = 90% of green prey) survived. Prey need to survive to reproduce so the proportion of prey in the next generation depends on how many of each treatment survived. Thus, on the next day you deploy 100 more prey, but this time the ratios are different: 60 green prey are deployed ( = [45 / (30+45)] = 0.6*100) and only 40 brown prey ( = [30 / (30+45)] = 0.4*100). Each successive deployment represents a generation. If this process is repeated for 5-10 generations you should be able to see a change in the proportion of each phenotype in your population over time. The more generations you run the better data you will get.

    Of course, this design can also be modified to ask an almost limitless number of questions and gives students a first hand snapshot of how evolutionary process work. Allen et al. (1993) includes a general procedure and the basic methods for field experiments using fake caterpillars, similar to Barber (2012), but Allen et al. go an extra step and provide modified methods and example results for 6 different projects that teach various principals in evolution by natural selection, such as:
    1. Directional selection
    2. Spread of new mutations
    3. Crypsis in uniform backgrounds
    4. Crypsis in varied backgrounds
    5. Disruptive selection


    Further thoughts about fake caterpillar experiments:

    I have had a fair amount of experience making similar caterpillars. Between multiple experiments during my PhD I have now made over 1500 model caterpillars. Most of these models were used to study how well eyespots can protect caterpillars from wild bird predators. Either pastry or modelling clay can be used for these experiments with the main difference being that the edible pastry provides a food reward comparable to that of a similar sized caterpillar. Clay caterpillars are effectively inedible and once birds realize this it could reduce their incentive to search for them. Another advantage of pastry is that it is easier to obtain the desired colour for your fake caterpillars. Simply adding different amounts of food colouring to dye the pastry dough is easier than mixing different colours of clay together. That being said, when teaching a class of younger students it might be easier and less messy to just use modelling clay.


    My recipe for pastry caterpillars: 

    Ingredients:
    • 1/3 cup of lard (I used Tenderflake)
    • 1 cup of flour (You will get better colour from food colouring if you use White flour)
    • 15 ml water
    • Food colouring

    Directions:
    • Cut the lard into the flour. 
    • Add desired amount of food colouring and the water
    • Hand mix and kneed the dough until the food colouring dough is a uniform colour and texture
    • The most common mistake is adding too much water. The dough will get very sticky instead of being easy to mould and work with. To remedy this you can work the dough and let it sit, but it make take a while for it to lose moisture. Adding more flour & lard mix might be quicker option.
    • Don't let the dough sit out too long or it will dry out. Freeze unused dough and prepared caterpillars in a ziplock bag until you are ready to deploy


    In my paper on caterpillar eyespots I used a Play-Doh Mini Fun Factory (Hasbro Canada Corp., Longueuil, QC, Canada) to press out long strips of dough that I used to standardize the caterpillar size. A similar technique might be worth considering for teachers planning to make numerous fake caterpillars.


    Deploying caterpillars:

    A pastry caterpillar pinned to a tree branch. This one was attacked at both ends by a bird.

    Older students could use dress making pins to
    attach pastry caterpillars to  tree branches

    My pastry caterpillars were pinned to tree branches using dress making pins, and this technique worked really well for securing the caterpillars to tree branches. Once I found a suitable branch I pressed the pin partway through it (make sure to buy a thimble!), then stuck the pastry caterpillar onto the pin. For better stability on the branch it helps if you mould the caterpillar to the branch a little bit. If pins seem a little too dangerous for your students Barber suggests using silicone which can be purchased at a hardware store. This would allow you to attach small caterpillars to tree leaves as well as branches. I do wonder about the possible toxicity of silicone to birds that eat or peck the baits though. With pins you don't have to worry about the possible toxic effects of adhesives, and they invariably remain in the tree when a bird removes or feeds on the fake caterpillar. You will need to remove pins after you are done, I suggest using needle nose pliers.


    Aside: This brings up an interesting point. All research conducted by members of a University of College which involves any vertebrate animal (plus Cephalopoda) requires approval from an Animal Care Committee. Even my research on caterpillar eyespots where I was basically feeding pastry to wild birds needed such approval. I'm not sure whether elementary or secondary schools have some similar committees, but if they are involving vertebrate animals they probably should. Does anyone know what rules or restrictions exist that might affect elementary of secondary institutions looking to do this kind of laboratory exercise?


    If none of these methods of attaching caterpillars to trees sound like a good option you can just place the pastry caterpillars directly on a short-cut lawn, pieces of astroturf, or painted wooden platforms:


    Northern Cardinal feeing on plain pastry and bird seed on a raised platform during the training phase of an experiment 


    Analysis:

    The final step would be to do some kind of analysis. For elementary or high school it is probably sufficient to just have them build graphs. In the simplest version of this lab students could just compare how many prey from each treatment were killed after a single deployment (i.e., a single "generation"). This could involve a simple bar graph comparing the survival of each treatment.

    If you are planning to teach evolution though it would be better to look at the change in proportion of each treatment across successive generations. Get the students to plot the proportion deployed at the start of each treatment, this will show them graphically how the frequency of each phenotype changed in their population over time. This is directly analogous to the change in frequency of the genes that carry those phenotypes in population (i.e., evolution!). You could also get them to plot the proportion of prey from each treatment that were attacked.

    Here are two examples of plots from Allen et al 1993:




    Additional thoughts for advanced students:



    • What are the limitations of using survival as a measure of fitness
    • What is apostatic selection?
    • What is a "search image"? How might the formation of a "search image" affect rates of predation?
    • If one treatment survives better on average, why might multiple phenotypes persist in a population?

    References:


    Allen, J. A. and Anderson, K. P. (1984) Selection by passerine birds is anti-apostatic at high prey density. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 237–246.

    Allen, J. A., Cooper, J. M., Hall, G. J. and McHenry C. (1993) 'Evolving pastry': a method for simulating microevolution. Journal of Biological Education 27(4): 274-282.

    Barber, N. (2012) Clay caterpillars: a tool for ecology & evolution laboratories. The American Biology Teacher 74(7): 513-517.

    Hossie, T. J., Sherratt, T. N., (2012) Eyespots interact with body colour to protect caterpillar-like prey from avian predators. Animal Behaviour 84(1): 167-173, doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.027

    Rowland, H. M., Cuthill, I. C., Harvey, I. F., Speed, M. P., & Ruxton, G. D. (2008). Can't tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - B, 275(1651), 2539–2545

    Wennersten, L. and Forsman, A. (2009) Does colour polymorphism enhance survival of prey populations? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - B 276: 2187-2194

    Friday 7 September 2012

    BAD PORTRAIT Times Two!

    I may not know a lot about art, but I know what I like...

    Bad Portrait of 5th instar Papilio canadensis caterpillar. Painted by Mandy Stobo

    ...and I like this a lot!

    Recap: An artist named Mandy Stobo who has an ongoing project called the Bad Portrait Project. She has a SEND YOUR FACE section where you can send in a photo of yourself and she will make a "Bad Portrait" version then e-mail you a free *.JPG of it. It is pretty neat. I asked her if she would create a Bad Portrait of a Papilio canadensis caterpillar photo for me to use at conferences or as a logo. In my opinion her artwork is more rad than bad!

    When I contacted Mandy Stobo about getting a "Bad Portrait" of Papilio canadensis for my blog I sent her two photos to choose from. She chose to paint the "head on" photo (see that portrait here). She must have enjoyed painting that one because she offered to paint the other photo for me as well! She has really outdone herself this time, I think this portrait is even better than the first one.

    Here is the original photo that I sent her:




    You can find out more about Mandy Stobo and her artwork at the websites linked below:

    Thursday 23 August 2012

    BAD PORTRAIT TIME for Caterpillar Eyespots!

    Portrait by Mandy Stobo as past of her Bad Portrait Project

    I recently started following the Curiosity Rover Twitter account (@MarsCuriosity) which sends out tweets as if they are from the the Curiosity rover itself. This is pretty neat and a good way to keep abreast of the goings on out there on the red planet. I soon came across another Twitter account, Sarcastic Rover (@SarcasticRover), a parody twitter feed which also tweets as if it was the Mars Curiosity rover, but instead makes comments like "I'm on Mars, whoop-dee-fricken-doo". The logo used for the Sarcastic Rover twitter feed was pretty hilarious (Lets do a SCIENCE!), so I looked to see who drew it. 

    It turns out that it was created by an artist named Mandy Stobo who has an ongoing project called the Bad Portrait Project. She has a SEND YOUR FACE section where you can send in a photo of yourself and she will make a "Bad Portrait" version then e-mail you a free *.JPG of it! Pretty neat. I asked her if she would create a Bad Portrait of a Papilio canadensis caterpillar photo for me to use at conferences or as a logo, and a few days later she sent me the amazing portrait you see above. In my opinion her artwork is more rad than bad.

    Here is the photo I sent her:



    You can find out more about Mandy Stobo and her artwork at the websites linked below: